Flock cameras

Asked detailed questions about data retention, ownership, FOIA status, whether cameras do facial recognition, and whether data flows to the state, FBI, or ICE.

Argued the cameras treat every driver as a criminal, cited audits showing 99.5% of scans are unrelated to crime and 20-40% error rates, and urged a judicial warrant requirement and third-party auditing.

Said he's not accusing anyone but wants the right questions asked; recounted being stopped at gunpoint over a plate misread, raised concerns about camera locations, drone expansion, and who pays for damaged cameras.

Argued the cameras go beyond single traffic photos by building a nationwide networked map of behavior, citing a Wisconsin case where a cleared woman was twice wrongly pulled over at gunpoint, and said the system crosses Fourth Amendment lines.